Recently, the notion of "symmetry" has been raised in discussions concerning the treatment of women, their dignity and modesty, during times of war – in relation to Hamas fighters-terrorists on one hand, and Israeli fighters on the other.
The very procedure, of invoking "symmetry" as a means of justifying exceptional acts, is a common device employed by the right in Israel. Such a comparison inherently suggests that the actions of Israeli fighters are "less severe" when placed in relation to those of their adversaries. This type of reasoning frequently leads to historical analogies, often referencing WWII (the aftermath of which saw the development of international humanitarian law) and, in many cases, even invoking comparisons to the actions of the Nazis. These references, when used as moral benchmarks, can dangerously blur ethical lines and erode necessary restraint.
However, in ethical and moral deliberations of this nature, engaging in "comparative morality" is entirely inappropriate. Moral values, as well as the Spirit of the IDF, must never be contingent upon the actions of our enemies. The guiding principles of the IDF Spirit are derived from a range of ethical and historical sources: The tradition of the IDF and its combat legacy as Israel's defense force; The heritage of the State of Israel, built on democratic principles, laws, and institutions; The moral tradition of the Jewish people, upheld throughout generations; Universal moral values, which emphasize the sanctity and dignity of human life.
None of these sources draw any moral inspiration from terrorist organizations, nor do they justify, emulate, or validate the atrocities committed by such groups.
The IDF, its commanders, and its soldiers must uphold the highest standards of ethical conduct, ensuring that their hands remain clean, and their "arms remain pure."
"Revenge" has no place in the IDF. It is neither a "principle of war" nor a "basic stone" in the army's foundations. The conduct of the IDF is governed by military discipline, the laws of the state, and the binding directives of the General Staff and field commanders who implement them. Any deviation from these standards must result in accountability through legal proceedings and appropriate punishment.
There can be no tolerance for the emergence of rogue elements – whether militias or individuals – operating outside the ethical framework and command structure of the IDF. No alternative leadership, independent codes of engagement, or deviation from the army's foundational values can be permitted to take root within the ranks of combat units or on the fringes of the military itself.
